There are three main types of Roulette game available, and each one has its differences from the others.
Re: Safe roulette system - even chance Jun 10, 12:00 AM 2011 I have bustled with ECs, D/C and double and single streets distribution and also with parlay bets. Re: What is the safest 'grind' system? Nov 15, 11:33 AM 2014 And again, if the logic behind this system is true, and mathematically it isn't but in the real world of 50 to 250 spins it might be, then of course, with a larger bankroll, playing streets would improve the safety at only double the cost. How To Earn a Living From Roulette: The Real Truth. We’ve been playing roulette for over 20 years, and run the world’s largest team of professional players. We’re tired of the complete BS on other websites, written by casino affiliates and others without real experience. You’ll find the real truth about winning roulette here.
So it makes sense to say that people will adopt different strategies for each type of game. But what is the best Roulette strategy for each game, and what is the best way to tweak and optimize your strategy?
First of all, to develop any kind of Roulette strategy you need to able able to have time at the table and not have too many distractions so you can think your strategy through.
The best way to do this is to play Roulette online so you can have the table to yourself and enjoy the freedom that playing online allows.
Here is the perfect strategy for using on an online Roulette table, and one that does not take a lot of learning. It has proven to be very effective, and does not require much initial outlay to get it to work and can really improve your chances of winning at Roulette.
To try the best Roulette strategy out – click here
Step 1
Buy one stack of chips. In this example we will assume that the chips are of $1 denomination, so you will buy in for $20. Once you have your chips you need to break them down into 5 stacks of 4 chips each. You then need to play five of the 6-line bets, so each stack of 4 chips you have on 5 of the 6-line bets.
It is important that you cover as many numbers as possible, so make sure that you spread them out so each bet is covering two rows on their own, and not doubling up with another bet. As you will be covering 5 out of the 6 winning possible 6-lines, you stand a high chance of winning. If you win, you will win 20 chips (4 x 5 = 20), so including your winning bet you will now have a total of 24 chips.
Step 2
Step 2 is very easy. You need to break down your 24 chips in half, so you have two stacks of 12 chips. You then put one of the stacks of 12 on one of the dozens, and the other stack on another of the dozens. So you now have two out of the three dozen’s covered. If the ball lands in one of your dozens you will win 2-1 on your bet, so that will pay you 24 chips, plus the 12 from the winning bet will mean you now have a total of 36 chips.
Tip: To optimize your chances more, play European Roulette in your online casino account. This is because you have a better chance of success with even money outside bets when playing European rather than American roulette. You can play European Roulette here
Step 3
Now you have a total of 36 chips, and you want to break these down into 6 stacks of 6 chips (when playing online Roulette, you won’t actually be able to break the chips down into stacks, but you should just place 6 bets of 6 chips). Next you need to cover 6 corner bets with your 6 chip stacks. Make sure you spread them out as much as possible and do not double up on any numbers so you have as much of the table covered as possible.
If you hit a winner you will win 48 chips (6 x 8 = 48), then with your winning bet you will now have a total of 54 chips.
Step 4
Now with your 54 chips you will need to break them down into 9 stacks of 6 chips, and then place them on any 9 of the 12 possible street bets. Again you are giving yourself a good chance of winning by covering the majority of the possibilities, with your bets. If you hit a winner your bet will pay out 66 chips (6 x 11 = 66), plus with the 6 chips you have from your winning bet you will now have a total of 72 chips.
Step 5
Now with your 72 chips, you need to break them down into 14 stacks of 5 chips. The next bets you are going to cover are the splits, so place your bets on 14 different split bets and make sure that you do not double up on any numbers so you can cover as much of the table as possible. You will have 2 chips left over when you do this, so place these 2 chips straight up on any of the empty numbers as a kind of insurance.
Now if you hit a winning split bet, you will win a total of 85 chips (5 x 17 = 85), plus the 5 chips you have from the winning bet will give you a total of 90 chips.
Step 6
You now have 90 chips from your initial $20 buy-in, so you are doing well. But there is one final step that can improve your winnings even more. Now we are going to bet straight up bets, the highest paying bet on the Roulette wheel. So for this you need to break your 90 chips down into 22 stacks of 4 chips (total 88 chips) and you will have 2 left over for insurance.
So now you are going to place your 22 stacks of 4 chips on any of the straight up numbers. Do not double up, make sure you just use 4 chips maximum on any number so you cover as much of the table as possible. Then with the remaining 2 chips, place them on any of the empty numbers (1 chip on each), so if you do hit one of these you can start the process again.
Now if you hit a winning number you will win a total of 140 chips (4 x 35 = 140), plus with the 4 chips you have from the winning bet you now have a total of 144 chips, so $144 in this case. This is a good return on your $20 investment! If you are looking for the best Roulette strategy to try now on your online Roulette game, give this one a go….it works very well!
Click here to try this Roulette strategy out now
BONUS |
---|
Luxury Casino |
$1250 |
Golden Tiger Casino |
The Gambler's Fallacy is the mistaken belief that if an independent event has not happened in a long time, then it becomes overdue and more likely. It is also equally incorrect that if an outcome has happened a disproportionate number of times lately, compared to statistical expectations, then it becomes overheated and less likely to occur the next time. An example of this fallacious thinking might be that if the number 23 hasn't been drawn in a 6-49 lottery the last 100 games, then it becomes more likely to be drawn during the next drawing.
Many worthless betting strategies and systems are based on belief in the Gambler's Fallacy. I got the idea for writing about this after reading an 888 online roulette article by Frank Scoblete entitled How to Take Advantage of Roulette Hot Spots. In that article, Scoblete recommends taking a count of each outcome for 3,700 spins in single-zero roulette and 3,800 spins in double-zero roulette in the hunt for 'hot numbers.' Never mind that this would take about 100 hours to make this many observations, assuming the industry standard of 38 spins per hour.
Before going further, let me say that I strongly believe modern roulette wheels made by top brands like Cammegh are extremely precise and any bias would be minuscule compared to the house advantage. Thus, testing a modern roulette for bias would be a total waste of time. Now, testing a 30-year-old hand-me-down wheel in a banana republic might be another story. However, you're on your own if you win a lot of money from said casino and try to leave with it.
That said, if you track 3,800 outcomes in single-zero roulette, the average number of times any number will hit is 3800/38=100. I ran a simulation of over 1.3 trillion spins, counting how many times each number was hit, sorting the outcomes to find the most frequent number and how many times it was observed, and keeping a count of how many times the most frequent number in each simulation was seen.
As a former actuary, I hate to use a layman's term like the 'hottest number,' but that is how gamblers talk so will go with that. That said, following are the results of the count of the hottest number in millions of 3800-spin simulations.
Statistic | Value |
---|---|
Mean | 122.02 |
Median | 121 |
Mode | 120 |
90th Percentile | 128 |
95th Percentile | 131 |
99th Percentile | 136 |
99.9th Percentile | 142 |
Here is what the table above means in plain simple English.
The results are very similar with 3,700 spins tracked on a single-zero wheel. Following is a summary of the results.
Statistic | Value |
---|---|
Mean | 121.90 |
Median | 121 |
Mode | 120 |
90th Percentile | 128 |
95th Percentile | 131 |
99th Percentile | 136 |
99.9th Percentile | 142 |
The following table shows the full results of the simulation on both wheels. The two commulative columns show the probability that the count of the hottest number is the number on the left column or more. For example, the probability the hottest number in 3,700 spins of single-zero roulette is 130 or more is 0.072044.
Count | Probability Single Zero | Cummulative Single Zero | Probability Double Zero | Cummulative Double Zero |
---|---|---|---|---|
160 or More | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 |
159 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 |
158 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 | 0.000001 |
157 | 0.000001 | 0.000002 | 0.000001 | 0.000002 |
156 | 0.000001 | 0.000003 | 0.000001 | 0.000003 |
155 | 0.000002 | 0.000005 | 0.000002 | 0.000005 |
154 | 0.000003 | 0.000009 | 0.000003 | 0.000008 |
153 | 0.000005 | 0.000013 | 0.000005 | 0.000013 |
152 | 0.000007 | 0.000020 | 0.000008 | 0.000021 |
151 | 0.000012 | 0.000032 | 0.000012 | 0.000033 |
150 | 0.000017 | 0.000049 | 0.000018 | 0.000051 |
149 | 0.000026 | 0.000075 | 0.000027 | 0.000077 |
148 | 0.000038 | 0.000114 | 0.000041 | 0.000118 |
147 | 0.000060 | 0.000174 | 0.000062 | 0.000180 |
146 | 0.000091 | 0.000265 | 0.000092 | 0.000273 |
145 | 0.000132 | 0.000397 | 0.000137 | 0.000409 |
144 | 0.000195 | 0.000592 | 0.000199 | 0.000608 |
143 | 0.000282 | 0.000874 | 0.000289 | 0.000898 |
142 | 0.000409 | 0.001283 | 0.000421 | 0.001319 |
141 | 0.000580 | 0.001863 | 0.000606 | 0.001925 |
140 | 0.000833 | 0.002696 | 0.000860 | 0.002784 |
139 | 0.001186 | 0.003882 | 0.001215 | 0.003999 |
138 | 0.001652 | 0.005534 | 0.001704 | 0.005703 |
137 | 0.002315 | 0.007849 | 0.002374 | 0.008077 |
136 | 0.003175 | 0.011023 | 0.003286 | 0.011363 |
135 | 0.004355 | 0.015378 | 0.004489 | 0.015852 |
134 | 0.005916 | 0.021295 | 0.006088 | 0.021940 |
133 | 0.007939 | 0.029233 | 0.008196 | 0.030136 |
132 | 0.010601 | 0.039834 | 0.010908 | 0.041044 |
131 | 0.013991 | 0.053824 | 0.014384 | 0.055428 |
130 | 0.018220 | 0.072044 | 0.018757 | 0.074185 |
129 | 0.023498 | 0.095542 | 0.024114 | 0.098299 |
128 | 0.029866 | 0.125408 | 0.030603 | 0.128901 |
127 | 0.037288 | 0.162696 | 0.038228 | 0.167130 |
126 | 0.045771 | 0.208467 | 0.046898 | 0.214027 |
125 | 0.055165 | 0.263632 | 0.056310 | 0.270337 |
124 | 0.064853 | 0.328485 | 0.066020 | 0.336357 |
123 | 0.074178 | 0.402662 | 0.075236 | 0.411593 |
122 | 0.081929 | 0.484591 | 0.082885 | 0.494479 |
121 | 0.087158 | 0.571750 | 0.087696 | 0.582174 |
120 | 0.088520 | 0.660269 | 0.088559 | 0.670734 |
119 | 0.084982 | 0.745252 | 0.084406 | 0.755140 |
118 | 0.076454 | 0.821705 | 0.075245 | 0.830385 |
117 | 0.063606 | 0.885312 | 0.061851 | 0.892236 |
116 | 0.048069 | 0.933381 | 0.046111 | 0.938347 |
115 | 0.032432 | 0.965813 | 0.030604 | 0.968952 |
114 | 0.019117 | 0.984930 | 0.017664 | 0.986616 |
113 | 0.009567 | 0.994496 | 0.008614 | 0.995230 |
112 | 0.003894 | 0.998390 | 0.003420 | 0.998650 |
111 | 0.001257 | 0.999647 | 0.001065 | 0.999715 |
110 | 0.000297 | 0.999944 | 0.000243 | 0.999958 |
109 | 0.000050 | 0.999994 | 0.000038 | 0.999996 |
108 or Less | 0.000006 | 1.000000 | 0.000004 | 1.000000 |
What if you don't want to spend 100 hours gathering data on a single wheel? Some casinos are kind enough to give you, on a silver platter, the number of times in the last 300 spins the four 'hottest' and 'coolest' numbers occurred. The image at the top of the page shows an example taken on a double-zero wheel at the Venetian.
In 300 spins, the average number of wins on a double-zero wheel for any number is 300/38=7.9. As you can see from the image above, the four hottest numbers were 20, 5, 29, and 2, which occurred 15, 14, 13, and 12 times respectively. Is this unusual? No. In a simulation of over 80 billion spins, the most frequent number, in 300-spin experiments, appeared most frequently at 14 times with a probability of 27.4%. The most likely total of the second, third, and fourth most frequent numbers was 13, 12, and 12 times respectively, with probabilities of 37.9%, 46.5%, and 45.8%. So the results of the 'hottest' numbers in the image above were a little more flat than average.
The following table shows the probabilities of the four hottest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette. For example, the probability the third most frequent number happens 15 times is 0.009210.
Observations | Probability Most Frequent | Probability Second Most Frequent | Probability Third Most Frequent | Probability Fourth Most Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 or More | 0.000022 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
24 | 0.000051 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
23 | 0.000166 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
22 | 0.000509 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
21 | 0.001494 | 0.000001 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
20 | 0.004120 | 0.000009 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
19 | 0.010806 | 0.000075 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
18 | 0.026599 | 0.000532 | 0.000003 | 0.000000 |
17 | 0.060526 | 0.003263 | 0.000060 | 0.000001 |
16 | 0.123564 | 0.016988 | 0.000852 | 0.000020 |
15 | 0.212699 | 0.071262 | 0.009210 | 0.000598 |
14 | 0.274118 | 0.215025 | 0.068242 | 0.011476 |
13 | 0.212781 | 0.379097 | 0.283768 | 0.117786 |
12 | 0.067913 | 0.270747 | 0.464748 | 0.457655 |
11 | 0.004615 | 0.042552 | 0.168285 | 0.383900 |
10 | 0.000017 | 0.000448 | 0.004830 | 0.028544 |
9 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 | 0.000020 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth hottest numbers in millions of 300-spin simulations of double-zero roulette.
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
First | 14.48 | 14 | 14 |
Second | 13.07 | 13 | 13 |
Third | 12.27 | 12 | 12 |
Fourth | 11.70 | 12 | 12 |
The next table shows the probability of each count of the four collest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette.
Observations | Probability Least Frequent | Probability Second Least Frequent | Probability Third Least Frequent | Probability Fourth Least Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.012679 | 0.000063 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
1 | 0.098030 | 0.005175 | 0.000135 | 0.000002 |
2 | 0.315884 | 0.088509 | 0.012041 | 0.001006 |
3 | 0.416254 | 0.420491 | 0.205303 | 0.063065 |
4 | 0.150220 | 0.432638 | 0.595139 | 0.522489 |
5 | 0.006924 | 0.052945 | 0.185505 | 0.401903 |
6 | 0.000008 | 0.000180 | 0.001878 | 0.011534 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth coolest numbers in the 300-spin simulations of double-zero roulette.
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
Least | 2.61 | 3 | 3 |
Second Least | 3.44 | 3 | 4 |
Third Least | 3.96 | 4 | 4 |
Fourth Least | 4.36 | 4 | 4 |
In 300 spins, the average number of wins on a single-zero wheel for any number is 300/37=8.11. The next table shows the probability of each count of the four coolest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette. For example, the probability the third most frequent number happens 15 times is 0.015727.
Observations | Probability Most Frequent | Probability Second Most Frequent | Probability Third Most Frequent | Probability Fourth Most Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
25 or More | 0.000034 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
24 | 0.000078 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
23 | 0.000245 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
22 | 0.000728 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
21 | 0.002069 | 0.000002 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
20 | 0.005570 | 0.000018 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
19 | 0.014191 | 0.000135 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
18 | 0.033833 | 0.000905 | 0.000008 | 0.000000 |
17 | 0.074235 | 0.005202 | 0.000125 | 0.000001 |
16 | 0.144490 | 0.025286 | 0.001624 | 0.000050 |
15 | 0.232429 | 0.097046 | 0.015727 | 0.001286 |
14 | 0.269735 | 0.259360 | 0.101259 | 0.021054 |
13 | 0.177216 | 0.382432 | 0.347102 | 0.175177 |
12 | 0.043266 | 0.208137 | 0.429715 | 0.508292 |
11 | 0.001879 | 0.021373 | 0.102979 | 0.283088 |
10 | 0.000003 | 0.000103 | 0.001461 | 0.011049 |
9 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000002 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth hottest numbers in millions of 300-spin simulations of double-zero roulette.
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
First | 14.74 | 15 | 14 |
Second | 13.30 | 13 | 13 |
Third | 12.50 | 12 | 12 |
Fourth | 11.92 | 12 | 12 |
The next table shows the probability of each count of the four coolest numbers in 300 spins of double-zero roulette. For example, the probability the third coolest numbers will be observed five times is 0.287435.
Observations | Probability Least Frequent | Probability Second Least Frequent | Probability Third Least Frequent | Probability Fourth Least Frequent |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.009926 | 0.000038 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |
1 | 0.079654 | 0.003324 | 0.000068 | 0.000001 |
2 | 0.275226 | 0.062392 | 0.006791 | 0.000448 |
3 | 0.419384 | 0.350408 | 0.140173 | 0.034850 |
4 | 0.200196 | 0.484357 | 0.557907 | 0.406702 |
5 | 0.015563 | 0.098547 | 0.287435 | 0.521238 |
6 | 0.000050 | 0.000933 | 0.007626 | 0.036748 |
7 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000001 | 0.000013 |
Total | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
The next table shows the mean, median, and mode for the count of the first, second, third, and fourth coolest numbers in the 300-spin simulations of single-zero roulette.
Order | Mean | Median | Mode |
---|---|---|---|
Least | 2.77 | 3 | 3 |
Second Least | 3.62 | 4 | 4 |
Third Least | 4.15 | 4 | 4 |
Fourth Least | 4.56 | 5 | 5 |
The least I hope you have learned from this article is it is to be expected that certain numbers will come up more than others. To put it in other words, it is natural that some numbers will be 'hot' and some 'cool.' In fact, such differences from the mean are highly predictable. Unfortunately, for roulette players, we don't know which numbers will be 'hot,' just that some of them almost certainly will be. I would also like to emphasize, contrary to the Gambler's Fallacy, that on a fair roulette wheel that every number is equally likely every spin and it makes no difference what has happened in the past.
Finally, it should not be interpreted that we give an endorsement to the 888 Casino, which we linked to earlier. I am very bothered by this rule in their rule 6.2.B. Before getting to that, let me preface with a quote from rule 6.1, which I'm fine with.
'If we reasonably determine that you are engaging in or have engaged in fraudulent or unlawful activity or conducted any prohibited transaction (including money laundering) under the laws of any jurisdiction that applies to you (examples of which are set out at section 6.2 below), any such act will be considered as a material breach of this User Agreement by you. In such case we may close your account and terminate the User Agreement in accordance with section 14 below and we are under no obligation to refund to you any deposits, winnings or funds in your account.' -- Rule 6.1
Let's go further now:
The following are some examples of 'fraudulent or unlawful activity' -- Rule 6.2
Next, here is one of many examples listed as rule 6.2.B
'Unfair Betting Techniques: Utilising any recognised betting techniques to circumvent the standard house edge in our games, which includes but is not limited to martingale betting strategies, card counting as well as low risk betting in roulette such as betting on red/black in equal amounts.' -- Rule 6.2.B
Let me make it perfectly clear that all betting systems, including the Martingale, not only can't circumvent the house edge, they can't even dent it. It is very mathematically ignorant on the part of the casino to fear any betting system. Why would any player trust this casino when the casino can seize all their money under the reason that the player was using a betting system? Any form of betting could be called a betting system, including flat betting. Casino 888 normally has a pretty good reputation, so I'm surprised they would lower themselves to this kind of rogue rule.
Written by: Michael Shackleford